Explore Articles: Fact-Checking Climate Data
Browse verified fact-checks and debunks addressing misinformation and disinformation about climate change, curated by European fact-checking organizations.
Which images are real and which are not after the passage of DANA through Catalonia
A video doesn't show Pedro Sánchez being hit with a stick during his visit to Paiporta
Méteo-France did not publish a more accurate prediction from DANA than Aemet
A study on the course of global warming was misinterpreted to promote climate denial
It is false that 112 in Valencia has stopped operating or that there is an alternative number
The AEMET radar in Valencia worked during the week
It is false that the cold drop was caused by the HAARP project or geoengineering.
The weather would be manipulated with the help of technology
Russia and natural disasters
The effects of the cold drop were not a consequence of “the Government destroying four swamps”
The Manises dam has not flooded or cracked due to torrential rains
The demolition of river barriers did not aggravate the floods caused by the damage
Valencia will not suspend the water supply because of the Dana
Alarming video combines HAARP, chemtrails and other conspiracy theories
Non-profit companies helped in the south of Moravia long after the tornado, using over 95% of the collected money
As a result of climate change, Arctic sea ice is becoming younger, more mobile, and significantly less extensive throughout the year
Attention to this extract from a 1971 television news program used to question the anthropogenic origin of climate change
CO2 emissions have a greater impact on climate change than nuclear tests
No, the recent heavy rains do not disprove global warming
No, a study in the journal Nature does not question the reality of global warming
Watch out for these publications claiming that nuclear tests have more of an impact on global warming than CO2 emissions
