Explore Articles: Fact-Checking Climate Data
Browse verified fact-checks and debunks addressing misinformation and disinformation about climate change, curated by European fact-checking organizations.
The Cheste dam could not have prevented DANA damage, as Alejandro Fernández says
No, it's not true that 90 million years ago it was warmer than today even without an increase in CO₂
These clouds were not artificially created
The footage of a burning vehicle does not show an electric bus
CO2 is one of the main drivers of global warming
The sun has up to 100 times less impact on climate change than greenhouse gases.
Map does not show “eliminated dams” in Valencia and is not related to the DANA disaster
Recent global warming driven by human CO2 emissions, not ‘little ice age’ or urban heat island effects
Gheorghe Piperea on measures to combat climate change
The nitrogen dioxide emitted by gas stoves has many deleterious effects on health, as recently reported by the press
In Spain, small dams were removed, they don't hold back water during floods
Watch out for these publications claiming that ships linked to HAARP caused the floods in Spain
AEMET radars cannot move clouds and did not cause DANA in Valencia
Video of the “bombing” of a storm is not linked to DANA in Spain: it's a montage
Misinterpretation of the conclusions of the study. It does not deny the influence of CO₂ on global warming
Beware of the fraudulent SMS that supplants the Aemet warning of a storm
Floods in Spain may have been caused intentionally
2015 consultation by an MEP does not prove that “chemtrails” exist or are used in Spain
No, HAARP can’t create floods, climate change can make heavy rainfall more extreme
Often shared severe weather photo from Spain is real
Neither did Spain “demolish” more than 100 dams, nor does the 2030 Agenda demand it
