Explore Articles: Fact-Checking Climate Data
Browse verified fact-checks and debunks addressing misinformation and disinformation about climate change, curated by European fact-checking organizations.
It is false that a floating power plant that was in Spain can generate natural disasters
Clouds can't move with radars, unlike what a viral video says
This video doesn't show the impact of DANA in Castelldefels, it was shot in Australia in 2020
Why isn't DANA's death count moving forward?
Solar panels produce a small amount of waste compared to other sources
It is false that the Spanish Government has destroyed dams, aggravating the consequences of DANA
Catastrophic floods in the Spanish region of Valencia are the result of a well-known meteorological phenomenon
No “hundreds of dead” have been found in the Bonaire car park
What is and how does the campaign with profiles from India that generates indignation for the Dana de Valencia work?
The City Council of Valencia has not sent municipal workers to place the Christmas lights during the week
No 30 reservoirs were destroyed in Valencia and whoever says so has nothing to do with the Tous dam
It's not the kings' escort in Paiporta, they're patrol cars owned by the local police in Madrid
Which images are real and which are not after the passage of DANA through Catalonia
A video doesn't show Pedro Sánchez being hit with a stick during his visit to Paiporta
Méteo-France did not publish a more accurate prediction from DANA than Aemet
It is irrelevant whether the Valencia radar worked or not on October 25, four days before DANA
Who is managing the crisis in Valencia?
The authors of the study on the rate of temperature rise say the work confirms global warming
A study on the course of global warming was misinterpreted to promote climate denial
It is false that 112 in Valencia has stopped operating or that there is an alternative number
The AEMET radar in Valencia worked during the week
