Explore Articles: Fact-Checking Climate Data
Browse verified fact-checks and debunks addressing misinformation and disinformation about climate change, curated by European fact-checking organizations.
It is false that the cold drop was caused by the HAARP project or geoengineering.
The weather would be manipulated with the help of technology
Russia and natural disasters
Everything we know about DANA alerts in the Valencian Community
Climate change makes torrential rains more frequent and intense, but it has not been confirmed that it is the cause of the DANA in Valencia
The effects of the cold drop were not a consequence of “the Government destroying four swamps”
The Manises dam has not flooded or cracked due to torrential rains
The demolition of river barriers did not aggravate the floods caused by the damage
Valencia will not suspend the water supply because of the Dana
The conspiracy theory that says DANA in Valencia is a “HAARP weather attack”
Alarming video combines HAARP, chemtrails and other conspiracy theories
Non-profit companies helped in the south of Moravia long after the tornado, using over 95% of the collected money
Environmental impacts of the fossil fuel industry outweigh those of EV metal mining, experts say
As a result of climate change, Arctic sea ice is becoming younger, more mobile, and significantly less extensive throughout the year
Attention to this extract from a 1971 television news program used to question the anthropogenic origin of climate change
Nuclear tests cannot cause global warming
CO2 emissions have a greater impact on climate change than nuclear tests
Misinterpretations of Global Warming Research Fueling Misinformation
No, the recent heavy rains do not disprove global warming
No, a study in the journal Nature does not question the reality of global warming
Watch out for these publications claiming that nuclear tests have more of an impact on global warming than CO2 emissions
